The infamous agenda for the North American Union is taking shape and the plan to do away with the 50 states and create FEMA regions is happening right now.

Economically according to Parag Khanna, a contributor for the NYTimes, America would thrive more if the government did away with the states and created regions. At first glance, the plan seems to be a good idea, but rather we must observe the hidden motive. The States of America exist to protect the rights of the individual rather than that of the collective. However, given the agenda currently underway, the rights of the individual are being forsaken, and the “feelings of the collective” throttled upon the masses.

The New Seven State Agenda for the North American Union

According to Parag, and those sourced in the report; the 50 states are dysfunctional and very messy, especially economically. With America continually on the downturn of leading the world in innovation, it becomes increasingly more evident that the USA is failing. “Advanced economies in Western Europe and Asia are reorienting themselves around robust urban clusters of advanced industry.” Says Parag. However is that the real motive behind it all?

The plan for a New World Order is very clear, a centralized worldly government where there are no borders and only a ruling class of elites who run the world. Placing that as another boundary line for the end times. Using the discontinuation of the 50 states, paints a clear picture that America is preparing itself for the New World Order.

Support independent Christian Research for $3 a month Subscribe

The entire plan for seven states bases itself on the fact that some states are failing while others have already bounced back after the 2008 financial crisis. However, exposing the real motives behind the crisis shows that this agenda for seven states is all apart of a larger scheme to further dwindle the individual rights of Americans, and to do away with borders and boundaries furthering the agenda of the One World Government.

FORBES’ Prediction for the next Decade

The idea to combine states and do away with border lines is not a new one, but rather it began 32 years ago, proposed by a man named Joel Garreau, his idea was to have nine states. Given the furthering of time, its now been dwindled down to seven, which should only make one wonder how long till it dwindles down to one. Centralizing government is never a good idea, and that is the undoubted plan for it all, federalizing all police forces to act as one rather than several hundred; painstakingly showcases the agenda for the North American Union.

Where the plan began is where the answer lives. Taken from his bio:

Joel Garreau is an explorer of culture, values, and change. To aid those who follow later, he frequently publishes mental maps.

Most recently he is the author of Radical Evolution: The Promise and Peril of Enhancing Our Minds, Our Bodies, and What It Means to Be Human, published in 2005 by Doubleday. Joel’s latest book takes an unprecedented, sometimes alarming, always spellbinding look at the hinge in history at which we have arrived. For hundreds of millennia, our technologies have been aimed outward at altering our environment in the fashion of fire, agriculture, or space travel. Now, for the first time, we are increasingly aiming inward at modifying our minds, memories, metabolisms, personalities, progeny and possibly our immortal souls. Radical Evolution is about altering human nature — not in some distant tomorrow, but right now, on our watch.

Joel is a transhumanist, further proving the point that the agenda for North America to be split into regions is an elitist one and not that of furthering the rights of individuals but rather the feelings of the collective. Joel is not the only one who is pushing this agenda. Hillary Clinton is also pushing the agenda, and she claims that America will have no borders within one hundred days after her arrival in the Oval Office.

FEMA Regions
FEMA Regions

Furthering the agenda of the North American Union, and doing away with the states brings about a strange coincidence. Under Martial Law, or during a national crisis a new map takes shape; and that is the FEMA regions map. Which uncovers an astounding resemblance of the new seven states map.

The idea is not a new one, and the plan to create the North American Union is happening right now. In fact, according to Forbes, it will potentially happen over the next decade; which began in 2013. This entire agenda resembles that of the North American Union, which is a part of the larger United Nations agenda for 2030.

History repeats; destroying the current states bears the resemblance of something which happened in the past and brought about the bloodiest civil war in the world. The question is, as they further the agenda for The North American Union will it bring about another one?



PARAG KHANNA. “A New Map for America.” NYTimes. . (2016): . .

Joel Kotkin . “ Joel Kotkin .” New Geography. . (NA): . .

Joel Kotkin and Mark Schill. “ A Map Of America's Future: Where Growth Will Be Over The Next Decade .” A New Geography. . (2013): . .

Joel Garreau. “Bio.” The Garreau Group. . (NA): . .


5 Comments on "Say Goodbye to the 50 States, Get Ready for FEMA Regions For the North American Union"

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
G Marie Gould

First of all, twice you’ve used the word “bares” when it should have been “bears.” This indicates a less than adequate editing team.

Second, you say Hillary states she’ll get rid of the states in her first hundred days in office. While I do not dispute that she may have said that, (I wouldn’t put anything past her,) it would be extremely helpful to cite specific quotes at that point.

But do keep up the good work of bringing such potential situations to light. We’d best keep on our toes for the near future.

Patricia Canon

Marie – You can also look on Hillary’s website. Opening the borders within the first 100 days in office is listed under her policy proposals. It cannot be refuted. Her goal is to END the existence of the US as a sovereign nation. A vote for Hillary is tantamount to voting for a coup d’etat – a kind of silent coup, that may become increasingly louder and more violent over time, as millions from around the world flood across our borders.

Actually no it is correct the way it is used in the article; we have a pretty good editing team, but thank you for the attempted correction. bear: to hold, to support, to exhibit, to carry oneself in a specified way, to endure bare: lacking clothing, naked, exposed to view, or lacking adornment For example; in this sentence I stated: “Which bares an astounding resemblance of the new seven states map.” – in other words, “Which (uncovers) an astounding resemblance of the new seven states map.” I actually stated: “Hillary Clinton is also pushing the agenda, and she claims that… Read more »
Lisa Hergenrather

G Marie Gould is correct. To bear a resemblance means to exhibit a resemblance. The word bear is used (properly) in this instance as a verb. “Bare” is usually an adjective. Nitpicking is silly, though, since English is such a mongrel language. It’s not easy to master all the homophones.


The Christian Truther Daily

Never Miss A Report - Sent Daily.

Thanks for Subscribing

Looks Like There's an Error, Try Again?